Scathing new city report repudiates Lee, Breed policies on Uber, Lyft

By Tim Redmond : 48hills – excerpt

Planners say TNCs have caused terrible problems because the city didn’t regulate them. Plus, on housing: It’s capitalism, stupid.

The San Francisco Planning Commission today discussed, if only briefly, a stunning new report from the Planning Department on Uber, Lyft, and other so-called Transportation Network Companies.

The report, which you can read here, directly repudiates the policies of former Mayor Ed Lee and, at least in the early days of her term, Mayor London Breed.

It lays out in exceptional detail how the TNCs have deeply damaged the city and how the city’s failure to regulate these companies has been a terrible failure…

Among other things, the report says, 50 percent of the increased congestion on city streets is due to the TNCs, which include delivery companies as well as Uber and Lyft, and these companies are seriously undermining the city’s ability to meet its climate goals

Uber has acknowledged it must compete with public transportation to grow. The company wrote in its registration filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in 2019 that its “growth depends on a number of factors, including our ability to …reduce the costs of our Personal Mobility offering to better compete with … other low-cost alternatives like public transportation, which in many cases can be faster or cheaper than any other form of transportation.”…(more)

Amazing how long it took for the city department to find a way to admit what many of us knew and wrote about for years. Early articles and independent observers warned about Related Inc. claims in their marketing materials take taking resident parking would displace people by forcing car owner out, making up-zoning and gentrification easier in the neighborhood they targeted in New York. It worked as promised there and is on track to work in San Francisco.

It is high time someone acknowledges what many of us warned against years ago. TNCs have created havoc on San Francisco streets and put the taxi companies out of business. Will anyone at City Hall consider taking actions now to reverse the damage they have done? Will the city investigate the tech shuttle buses soon? How many passengers are they really carrying?

RELATED:

What do MTC, Ford GoBikes, Motivate LLC and Related Real Estate have in common and why bring it up now?
https://metermadness.wordpress.com/2018/04/23/what-do-mtc-ford-gobikes-motivate-llc-and-related-real-estate-have-in-common-and-why-bring-it-up-now/ Metropolitan Transportation Commission,(MTC) signed an agreement with Motivate LLC that created a public/private partnership in 2015. BAY AREA BIKE SHARE PROGRAM AGREEMENT between METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION and BAY AREA MOTIVATE, LLC Or download it here: Program_Agreement

Holding Company behind Motivate is Bikeshare Holdings LLC. By most counts this is not a neighborhood friendly organization.
https://metermadness.wordpress.com/2017/08/30/holding-company-behind-motivate-is-bikeshare-holdings-llc-by-most-counts-this-is-not-a-neighborhood-friendly-organization/

California budget ends high-speed rail standoff, sends billions to other projects

By Eliyahu Kamisher : montereyherald – excerpt

High-speed rail agreement solidifies 171-mile Central Valley link

After wrangling over the future of California’s high-speed rail, state lawmakers plan to release a critical batch of money to finish a bullet train in the Central Valley, while also establishing an inspector general to audit the beleaguered project and authorizing billions of dollars in new money for rail plans across the state.

The agreement, included in a budget trailer bill that passed the Assembly Thursday night, ends a year-plus deadlock in Sacramento on how to spend the last chunk of $4.2 billion in bond funds for high-speed rail, which voters approved in 2008. Gov. Gavin Newsom wanted to march forward with laying track in Central Valley farmland and eventually connecting Bakersfield to Merced, but leading Democratic lawmakers blasted the Central Valley link and sought to reroute transit funds closer to their constituents in urban centers…(more)

These San Francisco Muni bus lines are returning for the first time since the pandemic started

By Silas Valentino : sfgate – excerpt

The power of community feedback is on display with the return of multiple Muni bus lines that will begin connecting neighborhoods together or with downtown San Francisco starting July 9…

Over the last two years, SFMTA reached out to riders by releasing a survey and hosting several open houses to determine which routes passengers most desired. The transit agency said it focused on bus lines that connected folks to essential destinations like hospitals and neighborhood commercial corridors. Their research gives a glimpse into how travel trends shifted since March 2020.

“Trip patterns have changed over the last two years with a noticeable shift in San Francisco residents traveling neighborhood to neighborhood instead of the peak period downtown-centric travel pattern that was prevalent pre-pandemic,” the agency said(more)

It is good to hear the SFMTA is listening to the public. Timing is interesting, since they just lost their $400 million Muni bond and they are getting ready to ask for a sales tax extension.

BART’s biggest day since pandemic began

Bay City News Service : sfexaminer – excerpt

BART’s ridership on Monday for the Golden State Warriors’ championship parade was the largest it has been for a single day since before the pandemic, according to the transit agency.

The 190,519 riders Monday was the largest since COVID-related shutdowns in the Bay Area two years ago but was still well short of the largest daily numbers ever recorded by BART…(more)

BART train derails near San Francisco, riders evacuated

sfgate – excerpt

CONCORD, Calif. (AP) — A Bay Area Rapid Transit train derailed during the evening rush hour on Tuesday, injuring one person and causing delays on the line east of San Francisco, officials said.

Two cars came off the tracks around 5:30 p.m. between the Concord and Pleasant Hill stations in the East Bay, BART spokesperson Alicia Trost said.

Help Open Lake St – submit a public comment today!


Thank you to everyone who has already submitted a public comment — with your help, we have already submitted over 700 Public Comments to the SFMTA — however, the deadline is Friday, June 24, 2022 (11:30 PM), and we need your help to submit hundreds more!The new final design proposal is EXTREME and includes four concrete traffic diverters/barriers at 2nd/Lake, Funston/Lake, 14th/Lake, and 24th/Lake with “NO VEHICLE ENTRY’ signs! This means vehicles will be forced to turn onto the avenues toward California Street creating even more traffic. To view the final design proposal storyboard, click here.

Pro-slow groups such as KidsafeSF and Slow Lake Street want diverters at every intersection along Lake Street which creates a publicly funded PRIVATE ROAD. We want Lake Street to be fully open and shared by cars, cyclists, and pedestrians.

ACT NOW! Click the button below to submit a public comment– it only takes a few seconds!

Submit PUBLIC COMMENT
TAKE ACTION. Here’s how you can help: 

  • Spread the word! Forward this email to your friends, family, and neighbors. Everyone in your household can submit a public comment.
  • Come help pass out flyers and spread the word to our fellow neighbors — Sign up here.
  • Call and make a public comment via phone — 415-501-0788. Messages can be up to 2 minutes long.
  • Keep up the good work team OpenLakeStreet! Together, we can do this!

    From your Friends and Neighbors,
    The OpenLakeStreet Group

    Two Perspectives on DTX Extension:

    SF’s Proposed Downtown Railway Extension Is an Unnecessary Boondoggle

    By Marc Joffe : sfstandard – excerpt (includes maps and graphs)

    With the Van Ness Bus Rapid Transit lanes in operation and the long-delayed Central Subway nearing completion, San Francisco transit planners and advocates are looking forward to commencing a much more expensive project.

    The 1.3-mile Downtown Rail Extension (DTX) would allow commuter rail users from the Peninsula, and (ultimately) intercity high-speed rail lines, to access San Francisco’s financial district without changing trains or taking a long walk. But with an estimated price tag of between $4.4 billion and $5 billion, a light rail subway line connecting Caltrain’s San Francisco station (at Fourth and King streets) with the Salesforce Transit Center may be an extravagance ill-suited to post-Covid realities…

    Marc Joffe is a Senior Policy Analyst at Reason Foundation(more)

    The Best Time to Build the Downtown Extension Was Decades Ago. The Second-Best Time Is Now.

    By Tom Radulovich : sfstandard – excerpt

    Imagine a weekday commute several years from now. You live on the Peninsula and are headed to work in Downtown San Francisco on Caltrain. The first dozen miles of your trip are great. You’re riding in a brand-new, bi-level railcar with ergonomic seats and wifi. Several hundred people are on the train with you, and everyone has a seat. It’s electric-powered, clean and quiet. The tracks have been separated from auto traffic, so it’s fast and reliable. Trains turn up frequently enough during commute times that you don’t always look at the schedule.

    The last mile of your commute is a different story. You’re dropped off at Fourth and King streets, a mile from the Downtown core and a mile from BART at a notorious chokepoint in Muni’s streetcar service. Assuming the Central Subway has opened, connecting Caltrain to Union Square via Fourth Street, that means a walk of several hundred feet to reach BART or the Muni Underground at Market Street, just to transfer to another crowded train and complete the trip.

    The proposed extension of Caltrain Downtown to the Salesforce Transit Center will close the gap. The Downtown Rail Extension (DTX) is the single most important unfunded transit project in the Bay Area and the one missing link with potential to take the region’s transit network from good to great.

    Tom Radulovich is the Executive Director of Livable City(more)

    Franklin Street Quick-Build Project

    sfmta – excerpt

    Improving Safety on Franklin Street

    Project Introduction

    Franklin Street is a North-South roadway that extends from Market Street to Fort Mason Park. Between Broadway and Lombard streets, Franklin Street consists of three travel lanes in the northbound direction, andwith residential permit street parking on both sides of the street. The section of Franklin Street between Broadway and Lombard Streets is heavily residential and encompasses two schools: Saint Brigid School, and Sherman Elementary School…

    Initial project goals include:

    • Improve pedestrian safety by increasing visibility of people walking and by reducing potential conflicts between people walking and people driving.
    • Improve traffic safety by slowing down vehicle speeds while keeping traffic moving.
    • Improve safe access to schools along Franklin Street for all roadway users through targeted improvements.

    This project is in support of San Francisco’s Vision Zero commitment of eliminating all traffic deaths and serious injuries… (more)

    Not sure how this improves Muni service, but that does not seem to be a high priority for the SFMTA. They would much rather spend their money on harassing drivers than fixing the Muni system. I went shopping with a Muni rider today and she asked me if it is true that the tunnel is closed. What do i know about a tunnel, but, if Muni riders are concerned, that should concern the SFMTA.if they really want them to rely on their service.

    MUNI, Are You Okay? What’s Happening With Our Beloved Transit Agency

    brokeassstuart – excerpt

    …The first operator I asked for their anonymous opinion about the agency’s plans to address delays and restore full service referred me to MUNI’s website and refused to say more. The next one closed the doors in my face.

    “Sure,” said the third operator. “Hop on.”…

    I wanted to fact-check the announcement made on MUNI’s webpage about schedule updates, but first I had to learn the driver’s landscape, since it directly affects the rider’s experience both on and off the bus. An operator chooses their assignment, taking a different route each day. Seniority gets you the calmer ones while newness earns you demanding routes like the 14-Mission or the 27-Bryant.

    “That one goes right by my place. Why is it always so late?”

    The 27 is chronically late because its schedule, allegedly unchanged since January, is impossible to honor safely. “[For the 27] to run on time, I’d have to skip stops and run red lights.”…(more)

    Study: Transit Boards Don’t Reflect Their Ridership

    By Diana Ionescu : .planetizen – excerpt
    Across U.S. cities, transit agency boards are overwhelmingly more suburban than their riders, causing a disconnect between decisionmakers and the people who regularly use transit.

    As a new participant to their meetings, Cam Hardy, president of the Better Bus Coalition, noticed something about the board of the Southwest Ohio Regional Transit Authority, writes Jake Blumgart. They were, in Hardy’s words, “Very white, very corporate and very resistant to change. Just cutting this and that [transit service] without really analyzing why a route might not be working.” Most of them, Hardy said, did not use transit themselves.

    “This is not an unusual dynamic, a new study from TransitCenter shows. The advocacy and research group studied transit agencies across 11 cities — Cincinnati not among them — and found that their boards were not representative in terms of gender, race or geography.” According to the study, “In New York, 88 percent of riders live in the city but only 18 percent of board seats go to their representatives.” On average in the study cities, 75 percent of riders lived in central cities, with 40 percent of board appointments going to those jurisdictions. Meanwhile, many boards hold meetings at times inconvenient to working people, making it more difficult for transit riders to participate…(more)

    Pretty much what everybody knows. Transit is not for the riders. Transit is a wonderful place to create jobs with benefits for contractors and consultants. The real goal is to clear the cheap real estate to make room for the new economic up-zoning engine. First step is remove parking and reduce traffic lanes and raise gas prices. Only they have been a little too successful and greedy. They forgot that the driving public is paying the bills and the driving public can leave.