AB 61 – Assembly Member Travis Allen: is sponsoring a bill that many in San Francisco oppose. Read and decide for yourself. Details are below: https://legiscan.com/CA/text/AB61/id/1055426
Bob Planthold, a concerned SF citizen who often speaks on behalf of disabled people and Muni riders, outlines some of his concerns with the bill below along with a request that people contact the Assembly members responsible for passing this bill, listed here: https://discoveryink.wordpress.com/state-legislators/
I send this specifically to various disability advocates. Assembly Bill 61 may cause more problems for people who use public
transit, especially: those with disabilities, some seniors, those pushing a baby in a stroller or accompanied by a toddler.
Assemblymember Travis Allen, from the Huntington Beach area of Orange County, introduced a bill that would allow any employer shuttle anywhere in California to use any transit bus stop anywhere in California.
He believes this promotes an alternative to private car use , such that congestion and air pollution might be reduced. All that can be very appealing to state legislators, especially since so many show enthusiasm for actions that promote “innovation” and “tech.”
What is left unstated, or is not noticed, is how behavior of these employer shuttles in SF and Bay Area cities affects people with disabilities, some seniors, and those with a baby in a stroller and accompanied by a toddler.
These employer shuttles often lurk in a transit bus zone for several minutes, waiting for all the employees who are listed as boarding at that stop. Sometimes, two different employer shuttles will be at the curb of the same transit bus stop.
This curbside delay means regular transit busses cannot pull in to the curb. Thus, anyone who needs to use a lift to get on or off a transit bus may be blocked from doing so by the employer bus[es] at the curb. But, this is not just a problem for those using a lift.
When employer shuttles are waiting at the curb, their height and bulk can block the view of a transit bus driver from seeing any passengers waiting at the curb. Those who may be slow in mobility, such as an adult with a baby in a stroller and a toddler, or some seniors, may not be able to get to the corner fast enough to pass in front of a waiting employer bus to get to the transit bus before it leaves. Some transit passengers out in the street, especially if short-statured, might not be easily & quickly seen by a shuttle driver when pulling away for the curb.
There also is a collision factor that can occur. During morning and evening rush hours, a transit bus stopping in an active traffic lane, away from the curb, might be rear-ended by motorists trying quickly to go around it.
AB 61 does not take into account these behavioral problems.
SF Assemblymembers, Phil Ting and David Chiu, have shown themselves strongly in support of various “tech” or Innovation” ideas. So, even though this AB 61 has been introduced by a Republican, there can easily be bi-partisan support – WITHOUT any consideration of the impact on vulnerable transit passengers waiting at the curb.
Already, California Alliance for Retired Americans, CARA, has expressed some concerns.
I ask each of you recipients, and the agencies on whose boards of directors or advisory committee you sit on, to communicate your concerns and questions to your respective Assemblymembers, www.findyourrep.legislature.ca.gov and to Jim Frazier, the chair of the Assembly Transportation Committee.
Jim Frazier represents a district that includes Fairfield in Solano County and Antioch in Contra Costa County. His chief of staff is Jim Day, jim.day.
It’s is even better if you ask the Assembly to take into account the effects on transit passengers, and delay any action on AB 61.
Time is of the essence, to get some legislators to think about us.